RiskSense vs Phin
Localised by default, not bolted on.
Phin is a clean, modern SAT for US-market MSPs. The trade-off is everywhere else: localisation outside the US is thin, phishing still draws from a template pool rather than being generated per email, and the coaching that follows a click is a generic course assignment. RiskSense was built the other way.
In one line
RiskSense matches Phin's UX and MSP-friendliness, then adds native localisation for every market your clients run in, phishing that's unique every time, and coaching that's personal.
- Native localisation across NZ, AU, UK, US and more
- Every phishing email AI-generated and unique
- 1-on-1 coaching, not assigned course modules
Feature comparison
| Feature | RiskSense | Phin |
|---|---|---|
| Phishing content | AI-generated, unique per phish | Template library |
| Localisation by market | Native NZ/AU/UK/US/more | US-focused |
| Setup time | ~60 seconds (OAuth) | Quick (OAuth) |
| Post-click coaching | 1-on-1 with Glitch, personalised | Assigned training module |
| Free training tier | ||
| No-repetition phishing | ||
| Spear phishing (auto, real-context) | ||
| Modern UI | ||
| Policy management | ||
| Training library | ||
| MSP partner program | ||
| White-label |
Why teams move to RiskSense from Phin
- Their client base spans more than just the US
- They want phish that look like the local market (NZ Post, HMRC, ATO, IRS) not a US template recoloured
- They want every phish to be one-of-one, not drawn from a pool
- They want coaching that's about the specific click, not a generic course
- They want a self-serve free tier they can offer customers without a sales motion
- They want policy management bundled in, not bolted on with another tool
Bottom line
Phin's a good US-MSP product. RiskSense is the better fit if your clients are anywhere else — or if you want every phish unique, every coaching personal, and your policy management in the same place.
Try it on a single team. 60 seconds.
No credit card. Nothing for Phin to argue with.